Some people argue that the time has come for a new Bible version. They say that the King James and even the NIV are becoming less and less relevant in a modern world.

Theological scholars have written extensively on the benefits and misfortunes of biblical content. The most radical thinkers are adamant that modern day editions must begin to replace archaic writings. There are those who have voted with their pens and written alternative wordings for biblical text. The new testament is the favourite section chosen for this type of attention.

The life and times of Jesus of Nazareth has been told and retold by many writers. Most narrate the stories in the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. The stories have even been converted into rap lyrics chanted by young people to hip hop music.

However, it is not just the way in which the stories are told. There are schools of thought that believe that the very content of the book must be reassessed. There are parts of it that were clearly written to apply to a period that is long past. Some of it is today deemed sexist and even racist. There are analogies in there that do not make sense in a modern world.

Perhaps a major revision of the book can be expected in the coming decades. However, if so, it will be nothing new. It has undergone similar treatments in the past. Two main figures are well known for their impact on the bible as it has been handed to us today. They include Constantine of Rome and King James of England.

In the past content was deleted because it upset sensibilities of the time. Some now think that that content should be returned to a new Bible version if possible. Sensibilities are different now and modern populations may call for deletions and additions as have kings and scholars of old. new bible version

Stop by our site to find out more new bible version

VN:F [1.9.16_1159]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.16_1159]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)